Dazed Thinking in Baltimore Can’t Stop Crime

Word study on Baltimore Sun article illustrates why dazed Democrats cannot stop their urban murder problem. (Pardon the popups on their site.) Let’s start with the article’s eye-catching, ho-hum, no-action caption: “Standing up for a cause: Baltimore hopes for a 72-hour ceasefire.”

Yep, merely “standing up” for a generic, unnamed, unidentified “cause” will halt those demented murderers in their tracks.

In their fuzzy thinking, they will not identify who from among them, is killing everybody else. A shot interviewee pleads, “Somebody pulled up and shot me on my way to work.” Somebody. Only somebody. He probably has some idea or description, but will not give it. Perhaps he described the shooter, but the reporter scrubbed the details to be more politically correct. So, he pleads, “People” need to put the guns down. Really? My guns don’t drive to Baltimore, pull up, and shoot anyone. You have criminals there, people of inner-city Baltimore. Point them out. Demand that your mayor and police hunt them down and eliminate them. Regardless of their color. Get rid of that mayor and prosecutor, if you have not already.

The same guy begs these same generic “people” to “stand up for a cause.” Okay. Cleaner streets? World peace? Global whatever? What’s your cause, other than bleating like sheep? How about telling your politicians you want the murdering thug gangs hunted down and hung from street corners? Make that your cause, and chase the murderers to New York City. How about “Take back our streets!” or “Shoot the murderers!”?

He says all of Baltimore’s murders are “crazy.” No, the murderers are “evil” but that is a word this anti-Christian culture has virtually eliminated. Evil. There are evil people. Get them off the streets, and your murder problem evaporates.

Unable to figure this out, the writer uses a guy on the way home from the ER with a bullet still in his neck as a “stark reminder of how hard it can be to stem a record pace of shootings and killings in Baltimore.” Hard? Not really: you get the degree of crime you tolerate. Period. Democrats’ — and squishy Republican collaborators’ — social policies have encouraged and enabled murderers over decades. Democrats enable, and then tolerate murderers.

That brings me to the subject matter of the article: a “ceasefire.” They declared a “ceasefire.” That’ll work.

They staged a “free-hug event” at a park. LOL. I wonder how many gang members showed up. They planned more than 30 other “events” designed to “pressure” [Who?] to “halt the violence.” How about showing up with baseball bats at a local drug den, kicking the doors down, and driving the thugs away?

They held up printed signs begging, “Nobody kill anybody for 72 hours.” Pathetic.

So, what was this really about, since it was not about stopping Baltimore murderers? That sign I mentioned — and another paragraph in the article — reveal what the entire charade was really about: it was a Democrat community activist gun control farce, dressed up like a “grass roots” response to crime.  The sign asking for a “cease fire” uses the profile of a semi-automatic pistol with an “X” through it in the word “fire.” Press release to the Sun, get a reporter to show up and interview a few select people, and you stage a little political gun control propaganda. The newspaper’s reporters obediently showed up with microphones. I bet no more than 25 people did the whole thing, but the the ACORN-like spawn groups can count on the leftist press and government grant money for printing the signs and paying rabble-rousers’ salaries.

Good black people of Baltimore and other Democrat controlled urban hell-holes. Wake up! You are being used and duped by the minions of Karl Marx who have taken over the Democrat Party. They hate America, and they care nothing about you. If they did, they would hunt down your murderers and hang them in public on your street corners as a warning to MS-13, the Bloods, Crips, and any young man being lured into a life of crime. That’s what NRA members like me want to do. Don’t you agree? No? Want your sons back? Want your streets back? Want shops to return to your blighted neighborhood? Want your schoolyards safe? Then, execute your murderers; send your drug dealers away to prison for a long, long time; tolerate no carjacker or convenience store bandit. Tell the police when your son tells you about a local gang pressuring him to join.

Listen to what these white and black liberal commies are telling you to do. They are telling you to disarm. Obey. Depend solely on the government. Look where that’s gotten you. Instead of slavishly “putting down your guns,” you should master your own city by picking up a gun, getting some training, and shooting back — accurately and effectively. Throw out the bums in city hall and find someone who will support your police.

Or don’t: just bleat like sheep, hold free-hug events, and descend further into the hell created by your community activists. But, don’t expect the rest of us out here in America to go along with the tyranny of gun control.

About Judge Who Blocked California’s Magazine Ban

Judge Robert Benitez just overturned California’s statute not only banning the future banning the sale of magazines holding over 10 rounds, but also mandating that they be confiscated. I took a closer look at the judge who wrote that California’s statute is unconstitutional.

Judge Robert Benitez was appointed a federal judge by President George W. Bush. Elections have consequences. Thank you, President Bush and to all voters who chose him over his Democrat opponents. Not enough voters, and Judge Benitez would not have been there to stop the Communists of California’s Democrat Party.

Judge Benitez was born in Havana, Cuba in 1950. This means that his parents fled Castro’s communist takeover of the island. Perhaps Judge Benitez heard his parents recount the takeover of Cuba by the Communists. Perhaps because of them, he sees himself as guarding against the howling mob demanding dictatorial rule — in California.

Armed Tennesseans Capture Georgia Escaped Murderers

Glenn Reynolds likes to remind us all that the police protect the accused from the angry citizens; it’s not the other way around. Police stand between mob vigilantism and the criminal; police impose law on the situation. Punishment for the criminal comes later. Law, the expectation of effective and honest law enforcement officers, and the reliability of the judicial system in finding the facts and imposing punishment, are all that stand between a culture and anarchy. Counting on law enforcement, even the armed citizen need not form a mob to hunt down and kill demented murderers.

Case in point: the armed Tennessean captured the two Georgia demented murderers, and called the police.

The two escapees could have been shot and killed. The armed citizen probably did not want to endure an investigation, a possible prosecution, and a frivolous lawsuit by the families of the fine young tatted-up men who need to visit The Chair.

The law worked this time — but only because an armed citizen stopped the bad guys who could have stolen the car and committed more murder. You liberal Democrats for gun control should thank the armed citizen, and the NRA who supports the armed citizen — and all of us who voted for Donald Trump.

But, you won’t. You’re too busy being deranged.

At some point…

London, at some point, after Islamic men and women living among you, again and again murder your people, you should begin to realize:

–your leaders have utterly betrayed your country

–you have an Islamic problem

–your people have learned cowardice, to the point that instead of an angry mob rising up to beat knife-wielding terrorists to death, your police urge you to “run, tell, and hide”

–you need a gun

–you are responsible for letting all of these people — your own government and the Islamic world’s homicidal maniacs — do this to you.

Why we do not trust news reporters

Today, in my local paper taken over by USA Today, the editor writes a piece ostensibly about teen suicide. The caption is: “Guns and suicide go tragically in hand.” The editor and writer, Jack McElroy insists: “Second Amendment advocates may take this column as a call for more gun control. That is not the intent.”

Mr. McElroy is an out-of-place, longtime advocate for a greater government monopoly over guns. Yes, Mr. McElroy, gun control is the reason you wrote this article.

I note that you do not even bother to address why many modern westerners lose hope, and despair. You might address the underlying sickness that pervades the increasingly anti-Christian, post-modern, West. Something is deeply wrong, isn’t it? We don’t have just a drug problem, a crime problem, a “gun problem,” or a teen pregnancy problem. We claim license to deny our Creator, and then wonder why things have gotten so bizarrely out of hand. For all of our purported freedom from all constraints including even our biological being as male or female, somehow, we as a culture are deeply unsatisfied. Some — offered no reason to believe their life has any meaning — give up.

Others, however, hungry for power and wealth, see opportunity to use our crisis-of-being to morph our formerly limited self-government, into their own unaccountable selfish government, corrupted for their own purposes. Yet, you advocate that we should hand our liberty over to them and trust government even more. I remind you, Mr. McElroy of your presidential candidate of choice, Hillary Clinton, and I summarize for you in one word why we should never hand over a monopoly over firearms to the people who comprise government: Benghazi.

You are no more truthful than she, when you say you are not writing to advocate gun control. And, that is just one more reason why you and others in the mainstream media, too, have forfeited all credibility.

Ft. Lauderdale Airport Murderer, Regardless

Before the identity and motive are announced, I want to say this.

Execute him: black, white, or whatever.

Execute him: regardless of whether he was doing some jihad, or mad at TSA, or whatever. I do not really care about his motive.

Execute him: quickly. Sure, evaluate whether he believed that the airport was a funnel for alien earth invaders. If truly, criminally insane, we do not execute people for acts they could not comprehend were wrong. But, do not let the leftist lawyers force this to drag on for twenty years and multiple appeals.

Execute him: publicly. For effect. Teach anyone watching that he does not want to end up like that.

The trouble these days is that the very notion of “wrong” is dissolving and morphing into bizarre forms. We lack the moral fiber to execute the murderers among us. We butcher babies as they are being born, and sell their body parts. We loathe human beings for “melting the sea ice and destroying the earth.” We incessantly propagandize that people are just noisy chemical compounds, no better really than worms, certainly no more valuable than wolves. The implication is that we are just a brutal evolutional stage, and that, hopefully, humanity will evolve beyond humans. In the meantime, what matters it if a few of us get slaughtered? Right? We scoff at the notion that a person’s property is sacrosanct, such that bandits, burglars, and muggers are justified if the social class calculus works out in a politically correct way; it’s okay to carjack and loot a store; it’s even okay to beat a disabled white guy just because he’s white.

And, knowing that Americans’ lives are at greater risk, our former establishment leaders permitted our country to be infiltrated by drug gangsters and Islamic terrorists. They persist, even now.

And, these same “leaders” stir anarchy and chaos, encouraging some among us to go over the edge and into the pit of a murderous hell. They have caused the outbreak of World War Z. We in the West preach death and amorality in the vacuum of a “no God” culture, and then we are shocked when a remorseless, amoral murderer takes some of us out. It’s not shocking at all: it’s entirely predictable.

The same people who stir up this anarchy and chaos, demand that we concede police-state power to our government. It makes me conclude that they are not interested in controlling criminals, but they are determined to control the rest of us.

“Thou shalt not commit murder,” but we mock the author of that commandment.

Arm yourself. Resist government gun control. Demand leaders different from those who have presided over the demise of American culture.

Or, don’t, and get more of these demented murderers in our malls, theaters, schools, airports, and streets.

Eleven million bucks to Russian front

Just so you know, we just spent over $11 million bucks upgrading a military base in Estonia, about 50 miles from the Russian border. The army base is said to “symbolize” our “strength and resolve.”

False.

If the free nations of Europe want to show their strength and resolve, then show strength and resolve. A token force of French, British, and Americans is just that: a token. Estonians — and other Europeans wanting to remain free: Draft every young man and woman of military service age — about 14 through 60 — and assign them to a militia unit. Arm them Swiss style: carbine and kit in every household, ready to go. Train. Encourage the right to keep and bear arms. Bristle with fighters.

Because, you, Estonia, are a tiny country, with Russia to the immediate east. Do you really want to depend on the faraway USA for your survival?

 

By the way, we Americans just spent $11 million we don’t have. We are, after all, and after Obama, $20 trillion in debt.

NYT Lies About Carry Permit Holders

NYT editorial board tells outright lies about “concealed carry.” The editorial is here, “The Threat to Public Safety if ‘Concealed Carry’ Goes National. The writer is anonymous.

The immediate motive for the article is to stir up fright among the Democrat disarmed. Why now? Because the Republican Congress had better pass national reciprocity, if its members want to be re-elected; and President-elect Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed his support for the Second Amendment and the National Rifle Association. The stars are aligned to de-criminalize the ordinary, benign behavior of law-abiding armed citizens.

This gives the Marxists at the New York Times fits. Someone there has decided that the best strategy against national reciprocity is to try to make the public afraid. To do that, the Times lies about the statistics, which strongly support the more broad exercise of the right to keep and bear arms.

The NYT editors quote Violence Policy Center, a known anti-gun group. VPC glibly quotes outrageous numbers supplied by a group whose name at least honestly proclaims its purpose, slandering armed citizens as “Concealedkillers.org.” The numbers are so sharply different from my own observations out here, that I checked the source.

And, this is how the communists carry out their dezinformatyia campaigns. A glancing read at concealedkillers.org (to which I refuse to link) shows that these propagandists are very generous to themselves, in deciding which use-of-a-gun instances to count as murder. For example, after a few seconds, I found this one. A quick read illustrates that Anthony Martin drew his lawfully carried pistol in defense of his friend, and has been charged with no crime at all, but the communist propagandists at the NYT would have us all believe the opposite: that Martin is a murderer — a threat to public safety.

Concealed Handgun Permit Holder: Anthony Martin  PENDING

Date: March 2, 2015
People Killed: 1


Circumstances:
On March 2, 2015, concealed handgun permit holder Anthony Martin allegedly shot and killed Anton Fisher following an altercation outside the Hope Food Store.  According to a preliminary investigation, Fisher was outside the store when an altercation took place between his friend and another man.  Fisher pulled out a gun and threatened to shoot the other man.  Martin saw the altercation and Fisher’s gun.  Fisher then allegedly pointed his gun at Martin.  Martin then allegedly pulled out his own gun and shot Fisher, who died on the way to the hospital.  The State Attorney’s Office has yet to determine if any charges will be filed against Martin.

Source: “Tampa police investigating fatal shooting at Hope Food Store,” US State News, March 3, 2015.

The New York Times is unfit to read, and unfit to print. It is the propaganda flagship of American Marxism, whose parody on the Second Amendment is: “An armed citizenry being anathema to the communist State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms must be suppressed.”

Armed Detroit homeowner shoots, kills, lives

The nightmare came true at 3 a.m. for a Detroit man, but since he was armed, he controlled the outcome, not the two teenaged invaders who broke into his home. He shot one dead; police are looking for the other who ran.

I thank the Republicans of Michigan, the NRA, and the Republicans in the federal government who passed legislation and appointed judges who secure the right to keep and bear arms against the never-ending efforts of those possessed by the evil spirit of Marx, efforts always bent on disarming Americans.

Democrats: Yes, your party would forcibly impose gun control and confiscation on the rest of us, if the voters let your party get away with it. Part of the “Lock her up!” chant motivation is that she — and you if you voted for her — would lock us up. Yes you would, if you clamor for “universal background checks.”

I point out that your party is, however, generally soft on the actual criminals. Your top Democrat pardoned drug dealers and sent them back out onto the streets — perhaps to be shot by brave, prepared armed citizens.

Note, Democrat readers, that I have no idea of the race of either the homeowner or the criminals. I do not care. Murder is a terrible crime. The armed citizen killing another in self-defense should be honored, protected, celebrated, and assured that the weight of the law will not be slammed against him for protecting his own life, or the lives of others.